Serie de filme si articole pentru microstakes 6max - w34z3l

[armani23]

eu nu am sonor la download.

[mehigh]

eu nu am sonor la download.

La primul sau la al doilea? La primul nici eu nu aveam sonor ( cu GOM Player ), dar mi-am pus ACE Codec Pack si apoi a mers ok cu media player. Al doilea are sunet cu toate playerele.

[armani23]

al doilea film.
primul a mers fara probleme

[danuyz]

la mine a mers foarte bine primul cu bs player si codecurile lui ma gandesc ca o sa mearga si al doilea anyway thx mehigh

[Unkn0wn]

@w34z3l
I've just seen your video. Thank you for it and thank you for answering to my questions !

At 13:10 you have JJ and the board is 2s8s98 and river came an As.
Knowing that your opponent bet the paired board almost every time, why just called him on the turn and not raised him ?
As you said he likes to bet paired boards (see flop KKX played before) so this means he could not have a pair trips there in most cases.
So, this means he most probably could have a flush draw and he wanted to extract money in advance from you with this.
If so, why not raise him on turn in order to destroy his odds for the flush draw instead of calling him and re-evaluate your hand on the river ?
I know this is about my question you've just answered (about check/call, check/fold, check/raise decisions) and it is about +EV on the long run and it means you need to shoot the higher equity on every decision for being +EV on the long run. Right ?
Ok, then raising this kind of player on the turn wouldn't be +EV on the long run just because he plays paired boards like this way ?
More than this, calling him on the turn you allow to come a possible scary card for you which in this hand was Ace of spade which he could be have and which completes the possible flush also.

Thank you !

[Apache]

Am cautat dupa Aardweasel pe PTR.

Si eu astept episoadele viitoare cu cu interes !

Thank you ! w34z3l !

P.S. Ii sunt dator un miel ca l-am botezat. Poate ii explica mehigh datinile de la noi.

[w34z3l]

@w34z3l

Knowing that your opponent bet the paired board almost every time, why just called him on the turn and not raised him ?

You could consider a raise for sure. The problem with raising for value is it's a little thin. True, sometimes you charge draws, but a lot of the time he folds these draws and also hands like TT 9x (and worse), and continues with all hands that beat us. Usually if he does want to get the stacks in on the turn we are not in great shape.

The advantage of calling is it keeps his range wide, and if so inclined, gives him the option to bluff the river. The disadvantage is of course that the river might be a bad card but the wider he is capable of barrelling the turn the less we need to fear a river card.

@ the people worrying over my PTR's

The graph on the first page is literally at least 8 (probably more) different sites, so to find a reliable PTR graph is not going to happen.

Pretty much all my PTR's (except party) are positive and some sites like everest and 888 are not tracked by PTR.

The partypoker PTR doesn't look great if that's what you were worrying over, but I will point out -

a) The hands were played almost a year ago.
b) I was running around 25 buyins below EV.
c) $ might be negative but the winrate is positive despite the variance.

Judge the articles on the material/concepts contained within, not on a random PTR search. But you're good players, you know that right?

(Not to mention PTR has been known to be inaccurate up to 10-20 buyins)

Thanks

[hAnN18Al]

How do you find Micros cash game on Party comparing with other sites (PokerStars for example).

I play NL4 exclusively on Party an I want to move all my bankroll on Stars from december.

Can you help me with an advice?

I like POkerStars software more. I feel more comfortable here (perhaps because here I started playing poker ).

And about EV.

I run 4 BI below EV from 01.11 (this was the starting point in playing cash at NL4) ... 9k hands. What should I expect in long term?

[w34z3l]

How do you find Micros cash game on Party comparing with other sites (PokerStars for example).

The times I have played at party I get the impression there are a lot of regulars and the site is tougher than average. Stars is probably softer due to the sheer amount of players. Even if some of of the stars regulars are slightly better, if you table select well you can find softer games than you would on party.

You can't really go wrong with stars. If you want some of the softest games online you should check out everest or 888, but the software is nowhere near as good as stars. In recent times merge network is a regfest (but good software if you don't mind the tougher games) and ipoker has serious bot + shortstack problems. You will find the best rakeback deals on merge/ipoker/everest but perhaps it isn't enough to make up for stars awesome software.

Partypoker is fine though, there will still be plenty of fish and NL4 should be beatable

I run 4 BI below EV from 01.11 (this was the starting point in playing cash at NL4) ... 9k hands. What should I expect in long term?

You could check out the free variance simulator at evplusplus dot com for an idea. 25bi below EV was more or less the worst I've ever run (25nl on party) but I've seen people with ultra-sick graphs showing 100bi below EV. The larger the volume you put in, the more chance you will eventually see a big difference from EV. It should even out in the long run, so if you are running below EV the best thing you can do is keep playing your best game and not worry.

[hAnN18Al]

The times I have played at party I get the impression there are a lot of regulars and the site is tougher than average. Stars is probably softer due to the sheer amount of players. Even if some of of the stars regulars are slightly better, if you table select well you can find softer games than you would on party.

Partypoker is fine though, there will still be plenty of fish and NL4 should be beatable

I feel Party games are tough. At every table with decent average pot I find at least 1-2 regs plus a few shortstackers.

I work on my game but I don't feel comfortable on this site. I appreciate your opinion about Stars, and I think I'll stick with my plan

[adynecro]

[hAnN18Al]

Am o parte din BR pe NoiQ dar software-ul nu mi se pare ok pentru multitabling. Nu ma simt eu confortabil acolo.

Apropos de NL4. Poate o sa razi dar la NL10 mi s-a parut mai usor decat la NL4. Am fost nevoit sa cobor miza deoarece nu jucam in BR si nu am putut sustine o perioada de cateva zile in care "planetele s-au aliniat impotriva mea".

[Apollo]

Hello w34z3l!

First off all I thank you very much for your hard work!

It is possible to share with us your exactly color scheme of your stats?Or maybe you can upload your original HUD and link it here?

Keep up the good work!

Am o parte din BR pe NoiQ dar software-ul nu mi se pare ok pentru multitabling. Nu ma simt eu confortabil acolo.

Apropos de NL4. Poate o sa razi dar la NL10 mi s-a parut mai usor decat la NL4. Am fost nevoit sa cobor miza deoarece nu jucam in BR si nu am putut sustine o perioada de cateva zile in care "planetele s-au aliniat impotriva mea".

Offtopic: A fost o vreme cand as fi vrut sa incerc reteaua merge.Am cercetat putin pe goagle si am descoperit numai probleme la cashout-uri(majoritatea erau americani).Poti sa imi spui cum a fost in cazul tau daca ai retras vreodata?

[w34z3l]

It is possible to share with us your exactly color scheme of your stats?Or maybe you can upload your original HUD and link it here?

Greetings Apollo,

I recommend you make your own, but you are more than welcome to use mine. https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=343b7...600A6244%21441 I put it up for download here. Perhaps someone can post back here to say if the link/file works or not.

Thanks, Enjoy

[Apollo]

The link is good and also the HUD.

I will adapt it to my needs.

Thank you!

Here you go. I made some changes, mainly added some personalized popups for PFR,Cbet,FtCbet,3bet,Aggf.Take a look and tell me what you think about that.

HUD

P.S. Please confirm if the link works.